Historic Preservation Quote – Richard Moe

“When you strip away the rhetoric, preservation is simply having the good sense to hold on to things that are well designed, that link us with our past in a meaningful way, and that have plenty of good use left in them.” – Richard Moe, National Trust for Historic Preservation

Historic Theater Seats Available

A recent post on the National Trust Forum Listserve that will be of interest to the right person:

Historic wood auditorium seats for sale from 1922 and 1939 school
buildings.  Over 1800 seats available due to complete renovation of new
buildings.  The first 800 are available the week of March 15.  Others will
be available in the next year.  Make an offer.  For more information
contact Chuck Schmidt at USD 446 in Independence, Kansas at 620/332-1800



Their loss could be a Tampa area’s building’s gain.

Who is Creating Jobs in Florida?

A recent post on the National Trust for Historic Preservation website is entitled “Who is Creating Jobs in America?” Directed at the proposed elimination of the Save America’s Treasures Grant fund, the article provides a state by state breakdown of how the fund compares in job creation to the stimulus plan. Of great interest are the numbers for Florida that show that the grant fund creates jobs for a fraction of the cost:
  • $ From Stimulus Plan: $9,040,756,932
  • Jobs From Stimulus Plan: 34,887
  • $/Job: $259,144
  • $ From Save America’s Treasures (SAT): $5,084,318
  • Matching Funds: $7,481,293
  • Total Project Cost: $12,565,611
  • Jobs From SAT: 270
  • SAT $/Job: $18,815
To see the whole article and the parameters used to generate the costs, see http://www.preservationnation.org/issues/community-revitalization/jobs/.

 

 

Rutgers Report Illustrates Historic Tax Credits’ Ability to Create Jobs, Stimulate Economy

NEWS RELEASE from the National Trust for Historic Preservation & Rutgers University:


Washington, D.C. (March 3, 2010) – A comprehensive new report conducted by Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, analyzes the economic impact of the federal Historic Tax Credit since its inception in 1976 and concludes that the Historic Tax Credit is a highly efficient job creator—accounting for the creation of 1.8 million new jobs over the life of the program. The report found that Historic Tax Credits generated those jobs more efficiently than other stimulus options and, in fact, the study concludes that the economic activity leveraged by Historic Tax Credit returns more tax revenue to the U.S. Treasury than the cost of implementing the program. The report, the first-ever to examine the economic impact of the Historic Tax Credit, also underscores the need for additional legislation to strengthen the federal credits, making them more widely available for smaller, rural projects and also encouraging their use for green and sustainable rehab projects.

The report was conducted by researchers at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, and commissioned by the Historic Tax Credit Coalition, a public policy advocacy organization.

Major findings of the report include:
• The Historic Tax Credit is an efficient job creator— rehabilitation investments have generated about 1.8 million new jobs since 1976 and 58.8 thousand in 2008 alone. The Rutgers study shows that historic rehab projects require more highly skilled workers, generate better-paying jobs and return more economic benefits to local communities than other stimulus strategies such as highway construction. For example, a job created by Historic Tax Credits costs approximately $9,000, whereas the average cost of creating a job through the federal stimulus package is about $248,000.
• The cumulative impacts to the national economy are substantial, including $198 billion in total output, $98 billion towards Gross Domestic Product (GDP), $72 billion in wages and salaries, and $29 billion in federal, state and local taxes.
• The federal Historic Tax Credit is a strategic investment for the nation, evidenced by the fact that the total federal cost of the HTC, $16.6 billion in 2008 inflation-adjusted dollars, is more than offset by the $21 billion in additional federal taxes paid as a result of HTC project activity to date. In addition, the $16.6 billion investment has leveraged a five times greater amount of historic rehabilitation costs—a total of $85 billion.

While underscoring the success of the Historic Tax Credit program, the report suggests several improvements to modernize the program and ensure its continued efficacy—all of which are included in the Community Restoration and Revitalization Act now before Congress. The legislation, introduced in the House by Reps. Allyson Schwartz (D-PA) and Patrick Tiberi (R-OH) and in the Senate by Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), seeks to amend the Historic Tax Credit to facilitate smaller, Main Street-scale investments, providing incentives for the kind of sustainable rehab projects that make historic buildings more energy-efficient, and expanding the number of properties that would be eligible to earn these federal tax credits.

“This report makes clear that historic preservation is not just about holding on to our past, it’s also about building a better future by creating jobs, spurring revitalization and improving the economic health of the nation,” said Richard Moe, president of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. “By encouraging the restoration and rehabilitation of older and historic buildings, historic tax credits are one of the best investments government can make—a key consideration in lean budget years. This report should invigorate Congress to pass the Community Restoration and Revitalization Act and strengthen the federal historic tax credit program.”

“This report shows that the economic impacts of historic rehab are aligned with many of our nation’s most important needs during these tough times,” said John Leith-Tetrault, President of the Historic Tax Credit Coalition. “Rutgers’ research makes the case for enhancements to federal historic tax credit as an important part of any Congressional stimulus package. Given how difficult it is for our industry to finance rehabilitation projects right now, the timing for these amendments couldn’t better.”

The report was produced by the Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research under the guidance of Dr. David Listokin, a national expert in the economics of historic preservation.“This report reflects a 15-year effort on the part of Rutgers, working with the
National Park Service and numerous state historic preservation offices, to quantify the specific economic impacts of historic preservation,” said Dr. Listokin. “Using detailed models, we looked at both the direct, immediate economic impact—at both the state and national level—of historic preservation projects, as well as the secondary effects those projects have on the national and state economies. Our report, which builds on the regional economic analysis conducted by Dr. Michael Lahr, a professor at Rutgers University, clearly shows that historic preservation is a powerful tool for economic revitalization and job creation.”


A copy of the report is available at http://www.policy.rutgers.edu/reports/HTCeconimpact.pdf.

Historic Preservation is “the weakest kid on the block”

A thought-provoking post by historic preservation economist Donovan Rypkema entitled, appropriately, “A Time For Reflection” discusses the proposed funding cuts to two federal preservation funding programs: Save America’s Treasures (SAT) and Preserve America. His post calls for preservationists to rethink the way we’ve been presenting our case for preservation, since clearly the positive impacts (economic redevelopment, jobs creation, sustainable development, downtown revitalization, etc.) have not become widely known enough to Americans and to our elected officials. Otherwise they would not be labeled as programs whose “benefits are unclear” and easy targets for cutting, particularly in an era where jobs creation is so important. It is critical that we explain how preservation fits in to the revitalization of businesses and communities to elected officials in order to eliminate these types of short-sighted cuts seen as “easy” to pacify those who complain about federal spending.

According to the Rypeka post: This announcement had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the federal deficit. The rounding errors in the budgeting process are ten times greater than the annual amount spent on these two programs combined. Here’s the analogy. You have a household income of $80,000 per year, but decide “We need to cut back.” So what do you do? Eliminate $0.04 from your monthly expenditures. That’s right…four cents a month of an $80,000 a year income is the equivalent of these cuts.”

The National Trust for Historic Preservation discusses some of the reasons the SAT program is effective including: Save America’s Treasures stands out as a model of efficiency and effective spending. You see, every grant recipient under this program is required to find a dollar-for-dollar, non-federal match. To date, Save America’s Treasures at the National Trust has raised almost $57 million in non-federal and private matching funds. As a result, Save America’s Treasures has been enormously successful in leveraging private-sector financing and creating  productive and sustained partnerships with large corporations, foundations, and individuals that provide matching contributions.”

Historic Preservation Advocacy Week is the first week of March. While you may not be able to go to Washington to speak to your representative, it is a good time to visit local officials, or write letters and make phone calls to explain why you historic preservation is important to your community and to your country, both in terms of economic sense and quality of life. For some talking points, see these reports by Preservation Action, or contact TPI. Or submit the online form regarding this issue on the National Trust for Historic Preservation website.